Bob Gibson is the only pitcher to start and win WS games 1,4,7: 1967 against the Boston Red Sox. In 1957 Milwaukee Braves pitcher Lew Burdette started and won games 2,5,7 against the New York Yankees, all complete games, the last two shutouts.
Gibson started three games in each of three WS: 1964, 1967, 1968. His Cardinals won the first two. Gibson completed 8 of his 9 starts, including one that went 10 innings against the Yankees; Gibson also lost in 8 innings against the Yankees. That's how his 9 starts result in 81 innings.
Here are the pitchers with the most WS wins:
1. | Whitey Ford | 10 | 146.0 IP |
2. | Red Ruffing | 7 | 85.2 IP |
Bob Gibson | 7 | 81.0 IP | |
Allie Reynolds | 7 | 77.1 IP | |
5. | Chief Bender | 6 | 85.0 IP |
Waite Hoyt | 6 | 83.2 IP | |
Lefty Gomez | 6 | 50.1 IP |
Ford 10-8 (lost his last four WS starts); ERA 2.71 in 11 WS
Ruffing 7-2; ERA 2.63 in 7 WS
Gibson 7-2; ERA 1.89 in 3 WS; lost first and last WS games
Reynolds 7-2; ERA 2.79 in 6 WS; Yankees won all 6
Bender 6-4; ERA 2.44 in 5 WS
Hoyt 6-4; ERA 1.83 in 7 WS
Gomez 6-0; ERA 2.86 in 5 WS; Yankees won all 5
Year | Age | Tm | Lg | Series | Rslt | Opp | W | L | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | WPA | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1964 MVP | 28 | STL | NL | WS | W | NYY | 2 | 1 | .667 | 3.00 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 27.0 | 23 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 31 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 113 | 1.148 | 7.7 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 10.3 | 3.88 | 0.27 |
1967 MVP | 31 | STL | NL | WS | W | BOS | 3 | 0 | 1.000 | 1.00 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 27.0 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 98 | 0.704 | 4.7 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 8.7 | 5.20 | 0.99 |
1968 | 32 | STL | NL | WS | L | DET | 2 | 1 | .667 | 1.67 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 27.0 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101 | 0.815 | 6.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 11.7 | 8.75 | 0.38 |
3 Yrs (3 Series) | 7 | 2 | .778 | 1.89 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 81.0 | 55 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 17 | 3 | 92 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 312 | 0.889 | 6.1 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 10.2 | 5.41 | 1.64 | ||||||
3 WS | 7 | 2 | .778 | 1.89 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 81.0 | 55 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 17 | 3 | 92 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 312 | 0.889 | 6.1 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 10.2 | 5.41 | 1.64 |
Rk |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
Rk | Year | Series | Date | Tm | Opp | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | IR | IS | SB | CS | PO | AB | 2B | 3B | IBB | GDP | SF | ROE | WPA | RE24 | Entered | Exited | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1964 | WS g2 | Oct 8 | STL | NYY | L,3-8 | GS-8 | L(0-1) | 99 | 8.0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 4.50 | 36 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.19 | -0.128 | -0.09 | 1t start tie | 8t 3 out d3 | |||||||
2 | 1964 | WS g5 | Oct 12 | STL | @ | NYY | W,5-2 | CG(10) | W(1-1) | 3 | 10.0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 2.00 | 39 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.35 | 0.117 | 2.61 | 1b start tie | 10b 3 out a3 | ||||||
3 | 1964 | WS g7 | Oct 15 | STL | NYY | W,7-5 | CG | W(2-1) | 2 | 9.0 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3.00 | 38 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | .80 | 0.279 | -0.60 | 1t start tie | 9t 3 out a2 | |||||||
1967 Postseason | Year | Series | Tm | Opp | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | IR | IS | SB | CS | PO | AB | 2B | 3B | IBB | GDP | SF | ROE | WPA | RE24 | Entered | Exited | ||||
4 | 1967 | WS g1 | Oct 4 | STL | @ | BOS | W,2-1 | CG | W(1-0) | 99 | 9.0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1.00 | 33 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 80 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.49 | 0.625 | 3.02 | 1b start tie | 9b 3 out a1 | ||||||
5 | 1967 | WS g4 | Oct 8 | STL | BOS | W,6-0 | SHO | W(2-0) | 3 | 9.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0.50 | 33 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .24 | 0.148 | 3.80 | 1t start tie | 9t 3 out a6 | |||||||
6 | 1967 | WS g7 | Oct 12 | STL | @ | BOS | W,7-2 | CG | W(3-0) | 3 | 9.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 32 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .54 | 0.217 | 2.02 | 1b start tie | 9b 3 out a5 | ||||||
1968 Postseason | Year | Series | Tm | Opp | Rslt | Inngs | Dec | DR | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | HR | HBP | BF | Pit | Str | StL | StS | GB | FB | LD | PU | Unk | GSc | IR | IS | SB | CS | PO | AB | 2B | 3B | IBB | GDP | SF | ROE | WPA | RE24 | Entered | Exited | ||||
7 | 1968 | WS g1 | Oct 2 | STL | DET | W,4-0 | SHO | W(1-0) | 99 | 9.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 32 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 93 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .66 | 0.319 | 3.39 | 1t start tie | 9t 3 out a4 | |||||||
8 | 1968 | WS g4 | Oct 6 | STL | @ | DET | W,10-1 | CG | W(2-0) | 3 | 9.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0.50 | 33 | 6 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .50 | 0.160 | 2.52 | 1b start a 2 | 9b 3 out a9 | ||||||
9 | 1968 | WS g7 | Oct 10 | STL | DET | L,1-4 | CG | L(2-1) | 3 | 9.0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1.67 | 36 | 6 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .73 | -0.102 | -0.61 | 1t start tie | 9t 3 out d4 | |||||||
81.0 | 55 | 19 | 17 | 17 | 92 | 6 | 2 | 1.89 | 312 | 3 |
1 comment:
Hi Kenneth,
I enjoyed reading your post of October 18, which points out just how dominate Bob Gibson was in World Series play – he was truly outstanding.
But I have never seen any comment anywhere about why Gibson’s powerful performances were so vital to the St. Louis Cardinals. It was because the Cardinals played so poorly when Gibson was not pitching. In particular, the rest of the Cardinal pitching staff stunk when confronted with American League hitters.
Let’s look at the 1967 and 1968 World Series – I remember those well because I lived in St. Louis at that time. Gibson pitched six games, all complete, won 5 and lost 1, and had a cumulative ERA of 1.33. (Until he gave up four runs late in the seventh game of the ’68 series, his cumulative ERA for the two series was a minuscule 0.70.)
Here’s what the rest of the Cardinals’ staff did in those two World Series: pitched eight games, only one of which was a complete game, won 2 and lost 6, and had a cumulative ERA of 5.48(!). That is not a misprint. The rest of the Cardinal staff had an ERA over four times higher than Gibson’s.
In short: without Gibson the Cardinals almost assuredly would have lost both those World Series and possibly by lopsided margins.
Regards,
David Shoebotham
Post a Comment